The
modified sinonasal
outcome test (SNOT-16)
scale identified significant differences in the hypothesized direction for
those reporting more or less severe symptoms (P<0.001), Jane Garbutt,
MB, ChB, of Washington University in St. Louis, and colleagues reported in
the August issue of Archives of Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck
Surgery.
"The
instrument performed well in this patient group and can be used to assess
change in disease-specific quality of life in studies evaluating
management of adults with acute rhinosinusitis," they wrote. The modified
SNOT-16, a disease-specific quality of life instrument, is one of several
sinonasal outcome tests derived from the Rhinosinusitis Outcome Measure
(RSOM-31), which also includes SNOT-20 and SNOT-22.
These
tools have been found to be reliable and valid for assessing outcomes in
chronic rhinosinusitis patients, but there are currently no clinical
objective measures of disease resolution of acute rhinosinusitis for use
in clinical trials. Thus, tools to assess outcomes in these patients are
needed, the researchers said.
To
determine the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and minimal important
difference (the smallest change that would be detected as an improvement)
for SNOT-16 in assessing quality of life in acute disease, the researchers conducted a randomized
controlled trial at 10 community practices in St. Louis.

Patients received a 10-day course of either placebo or
amoxicillin (500 mg three times per day). All patients
also received symptomatic treatments to be used as needed,
including acetaminophen, guaifenesin, dextromethorphan hydrobromide,
psuedoephedrine, and saline spray.
The
SNOT-16 tool included four domains -- rhinologic symptoms,
ear/facial symptoms, sleep symptoms, and psychological function
-- and was completed at baseline (either face-to-face or over the phone)
and by phone at 3, 7, and 10 days.
Patients
rated how much they were bothered by 16 sinus-related symptoms using a
four-point scale. A total of 166 patients ages 18 to 70 who had acute
rhinosinusitis participated in the study between Nov. 1, 2006 and May 1,
2009. Their median age was 32, the majority (78%) were white, and 36% were
male. Overall, Garbutt and colleagues said the tool was easy to use and
took less than five minutes to complete.
They found
that it identified statistically significant differences in the
hypothesized direction for those reporting more or less severe symptoms
(P=0.02) and for those who were more or less bothered by their symptoms
(P<0.001), "demonstrating construct-related validity," they
wrote.
The
SNOT-16 tool also demonstrated "high internal consistency," they said,
with Cronbach-alpha scores ranging from 0.82 to 0.91. As well, there was
a significant decrease in scores over time (P<0.001), with effect sizes
of 1.45, 2.34, and 2.90 at days three, seven, and 10, respectively,
indicating a "highly responsive instrument," they wrote. And the minimal
important difference was 0.5 units, which "may not represent meaningful
change at the level of the individual ... [but] suggests that a patient with a change
in SNOT-16 score of less than 0.5 is unlikely to perceive any benefit from
treatment."
Garbutt
and colleagues noted that scores assessed in the office during a
face-to-face interview
differed significantly from those obtained from the phone
interview done the same day, within 12 hours of each
other. Thus, they wrote, if telephone follow-up is planned, the initial
SNOT assessment should also be measured by phone.
The study
was limited because the researchers didn't repeat the previous work that
was a part of developing the SNOT instruments, and because they did not
evaluate the validity of the test in patients with acute sinusitis.
Still,
they concluded that the SNOT-16 tool "is a valid instrument to assess
effectiveness of interventions to improve disease-specific quality of life
in adults with acute rhinosinusitis."
The study
was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases. SNOT-16 is intellectual property of Washington
University.
SOURCE: Primary
source: Archives of Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery
Source
reference: Garbutt J, et al "Use of the modified SNOT-16 in primary care
patients with clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis" Arch Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg 2011; 137(8): 792-797. Original article by Kristina Fiore,
Staff Writer, MedPage Today Published: August 16, 2011